previous point: Julianne Moore deserves all the awards in general that if they want to give you some more and even when the movies are not up to your talent
.
That said, it is not surprising that it has been nominated for the Oscar for My Name is Alice , where he plays a teacher linguistic diagnosed with a rare form of early Alzheimer’s disease. It’s the kind of role as Oscar – renowned actress to interpret poor or sick – and, as expected, Moore prefers to locate the emotional truth of the character and explore it with fairness and intelligence rather than surrender to the histrionics tear and fussy “look at me to be an actress.”
But by this time it is no longer a surprise to anyone, and even that raises The My Name is Alice above a friendly but anonymous mediocrity. The third film in the Anglo-American duo Richard Glatzer (which, in real life, was diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis before being run) and Wash Westmoreland came with the gradual process of disintegration of Alice’s identity with remarkable delicacy, with particular attention the perception of changes brought about by the disease (how the first “episode” is treated is exemplary of intelligence).
But precisely because of the performance Moore and the containment of thick film, it is unfortunate that My Name Is Alice can not “keep up” with, slipping to the more conventional melodrama, especially in predictable ways as the ratio of Alice with these children and each other is treated. Still, it’s not tape to rule: his modesty and his sobriety are comforting, and have a Julianne Moore in a big way is more than enough reason for the recommendation
.
No comments:
Post a Comment