Florencio Almeida da ANTRAL recalls that there are two court decisions favorable to ANTRAL and accuses the government of not enforce these decisions . Florencio Almeida said that radio stations already have advanced technologies and guarantees I have nothing against mobile platforms. Can not is condoning illegal transport. The head of ANTRAL says no want violence, but in the middle of a crowd something can degenerate ?? ??. If this happens responsibility will be the government.
The National Association of Road Carriers for Passenger Cars (ANTRAL) says that although there are two decisions of the courts that have banned the use of Uber transport in Portugal The company continues to operate. Florencio Almeida, President of Antral, accuses the government “not to enforce the law which manages the transport services and the decisions of the courts”. . Explains that it is for this reason that “. Sector will manifest For the public get to know what country we live”
About the protest this morning, Florencio Almeida does not hide a fear; ” When there is a cluster of many people, some of them desperate, it may be something that is not desirable. The Antral always has said he does not want violence but there are more people nervous and can degenerate. If were to happen the Government must be held responsible because they do not did comply with the law or court decisions. “
The TSF sought to hear the Uber this protest and the company said in a statement, said he respects” the right of any group must manifest since these manifestations arise in a peaceful manner, in respect for public order and tranquility. We hope that moderation and common sense prevail. “
The Uber argues that in Portugal” operates entirely in accordance with the legislation in force “and SAYS believe “that dialogue and mutual understanding with operators in the mobility sector – including taxis – must be the way forward: we are always open to discussion with all public and private entities”
By the time it was known the outcome of the injunction filed by ANTRAL, the Uber argued that the target of this legal initiative was a service, the Uber-Pop, the company does not pay in Portugal.
No comments:
Post a Comment